Fix license logic in the buildscript #246
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…evelop 2.0.0-alpha.5
…evelop Fix Buildscript And a5.1
imagine not having proper handling for build metadata in maven and no proper handling of multiple identifiers in fabric loader, thus having no way of having different releases which are only different in the way they're built? crazy
…evelop 2.0.0-alpha.5.3
…evelop 2.0.0-alpha.5.4
calmilamsy
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
Member
calmilamsy
left a comment
calmilamsy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overlooked that one pretty hard. Thanks.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes the buildscript use
rootProject.file("LICENSE")for configuring thejartask, in order to actually put the license into subproject jars.